How does reading a play differ from reading a novel?
Reading a play is similar to watching the events of
an authors minimal description unfold, while reading a novel is more like an
experiencing the events first hand.
Since a play only represents what the characters say and when they
interact, a large proportion of actions are left to be extrapolated by the
reader, which constructs most of the interactions in the book as largely
interpretive. However, reading a novel
provides a very strict conveyance of events, which requires less interpretation
to be done since the novel’s characters do much of the evaluation themselves.
How might Twelfth
Night be different if it was a novel?
If Twelfth
Night was a novel, then the author would be instilling a very specific interpretation
of Shakespeare’s play onto the reader, which would lead to a much more refined
understanding of the characters and their interactions through the inferences
made possible by the details provided by each character for the environment in
a novel. This is drastically different
from the interpretive framework of Twelfth
Night since much of the interactions provide only basic information on each
characters relationship with each other and a large portion of the characters
actual thoughts about one another are missing and must be concluded indirectly.
How does watching the movie differ from reading the
play?
Watching the movie is very similar to reading the
play, but, like a novel, it is a very specific interpretation of the events in
the play without the immense details that a novel provides through the
characters thoughts. The play creates a nature of subjective interpretation because
Shakespeare’s plays, like Twelfth Night,
only provide the dialogues of the characters and a very minimal explanation of how
the characters act, which deprives the reader of the actual thoughts and
reactions of the character provided in a novel that cannot be accurately
inferred.